Going West: Unforgiven (Part One)

Clint Eastwood, grizzled and carrying the weight of a violent past like a worn saddle, plays William Munny, a widowed pig farmer coaxed out of retirement for one last, bloody job. Two cowboys have disfigured a prostitute, and her fellow women have pooled their meager earnings to hire someone to deliver justice – or rather, revenge.

 

The opening and closing images of Clint Eastwood’s Unforgiven (1992) linger: a lone house, a solitary tree, silhouetted against a vast, indifferent sky, often bathed in the melancholic light of sunset or twilight. Most importantly there's a grave marker, Claudia’s name a constant reminder of a life lost, a past that clings to William Munny like a shadow. Claudia’s grave acts as a constant visual and emotional touchstone. It represents the possibility of a different kind of life for Munny, a life of love and domesticity, a life away from the gun. Her memory is what fuels his initial reluctance to return to violence, but it also underscores the tragedy of his situation. He can never truly escape the man he was, the violence that is ingrained in his very being. The grave is a persistent reminder of what he has lost and perhaps what he could never truly have.

Then that final title card, it’s almost a brutal act of honesty. After the complexities we’ve witnessed, the moments of apparent humanity in Munny, we are given this stark, unvarnished assessment from someone who knew him only through the lens of his violent reputation. It shatters any illusion of easy redemption, leaving us with a profound sense of unease. Can a man with such a history ever truly be forgiven, truly escape his past? The film doesn’t offer a comforting answer.

Released in 1992, Unforgiven was more than just another Western; it was a cinematic event. Arriving at a time when the genre seemed exhausted, often relegated to parody or nostalgic homage. Eastwood's film achieved staggering critical and commercial success. It garnered nine Academy Award nominations and won four, including the coveted awards for Best Picture, Best Director for Eastwood, Best Supporting Actor for Gene Hackman, and Best Film Editing for Joel Cox. This acclaim signaled not only a triumph for Eastwood but also a revitalization of the Western genre itself, albeit in a darker, more complex form. Unforgiven is widely regarded as a cornerstone of the "revisionist Western" movement, a subgenre dedicated to questioning and subverting the romanticized tropes of its classical predecessors.

The film's impact is inextricably linked to the towering figure of Clint Eastwood himself. Decades spent embodying the stoic, often violent, archetypes of the Western hero, most famously as the Man with No Name in Sergio Leone's Dollars Trilogy , had cemented Eastwood's iconic status. Unforgiven, therefore, emerged as a deeply personal and self-reflexive undertaking, a film in which Eastwood confronted his own cinematic legacy. He had held onto David Webb Peoples' screenplay for years, recognizing he needed to age into the weathered, haunted role of William Munny, lending the project an air of destiny fulfilled.

The narrative of Unforgiven ignites in the unkempt reality of Big Whiskey, Wyoming, around 1880. Two cowboys, Quick Mike and Davey Bunting, commit a brutal act of violence against a prostitute, Delilah Fitzgerald, their motivation stemming from a petty insecurity exposed by her laughter. What follows, in the response of the town's sheriff, Little Bill Daggett (Gene Hackman), immediately establishes the film’s critical perspective on patriarchal power structures and the corruption of authority. Daggett’s handling of the assault is not as a violent crime against a person, but as a damage to property. His judgment dictates that the cowboys deliver a number of ponies to the brothel owner, Skinny DuBois, as recompense for lost earnings, offering no redress or justice to Delilah herself. This blatant disregard for the victim’s suffering, the reduction of her personhood to mere chattel, lays bare the flawed moral foundation of Big Whiskey.

In response to this inadequate justice, Delilah’s fellow prostitutes, led by the determined Strawberry Alice (Frances Fisher), take decisive action. They pool their resources, their hard-won savings, to offer a $1,000 bounty for the deaths of the two men responsible. This act of collective agency, born from the failure of the established legal system, propels the central conflict of the film forward, transforming these women from passive victims into agents demanding retribution outside the bounds of the law.

Word of this bounty reaches the isolated and struggling Kansas hog farm of William Munny (Clint Eastwood). A widower burdened with the responsibility of raising two young children, Munny is a man shadowed by a violent past, a “known thief and murderer,” a life he purportedly abandoned years prior under the influence of his deceased wife, Claudia. The arrival of a boastful young man calling himself the “Schofield Kid” (Jaimz Woolvett), seeking the legendary killer as a partner in claiming the bounty, disrupts Munny’s attempts at a reformed existence. Initially, Munny refuses, clinging to his newfound identity. However, the stark realities of his failing farm and the pressing need for money to secure his children’s future ultimately force him to reconsider the path he had hoped to leave behind.

Munny seeks out his former partner, Ned Logan (Morgan Freeman), another retired outlaw attempting to live a quiet life. Drawn back by a sense of loyalty and perhaps the lure of the potential reward, Ned joins Munny. He’s the quiet counterpoint to Munny’s simmering turmoil, the one who voices that shared yearning for a different kind of existence, that hopeful, if perhaps naive, declaration: "We ain't bad men no more." But there’s a deeper conviction in Ned’s words, a sense that time and what he’s seen have truly taken root within him, changing the very fabric of his being in a way that feels more profound than Munny’s often-repeated mantra.

"Its a hell of a thing, killing a man. You take away everything he's got and everything he's ever gonna have."

The two set off to find the Kid, soon discovering that his self-proclaimed gunslinger prowess is significantly hampered by severe nearsightedness, a detail that subtly undermines the romanticized image of the Western hero. Their journey to Big Whiskey unfolds in parallel with the arrival of another bounty hunter, the affected and somewhat ridiculous “English” Bob (Richard Harris), accompanied by his eager biographer, W.W. Beauchamp (Saul Rubinek). This juxtaposition further highlights the contrast between the myth and the often-unflattering reality of the gunslinger persona. They're like a walking, talking commentary on how these Western myths get cooked up and swallowed whole. English Bob, calling himself the "Duke of Death" no less, is the very picture of a legend manufactured for public consumption, all puffed-up stories of daring deeds, no doubt heavily glossed by Beauchamp’s pen. Beauchamp, the writer of these sensational tales, he's us, isn't he? Initially, he's all starry-eyed for the romanticized violence, the heroic sheen of the West as it's sold in those cheap novels. He laps up Bob’s tall tales. But the moment that illusion shatters under Little Bill’s fists, Beauchamp is quick to transfer his allegiance. He's desperate to capture the “truth” of killing, no matter how ugly it gets, to turn it into another story.

At the core of this film resides William Munny, a figure etched by the deep divide between the man he was and the man he’s trying, perhaps futilely, to become. The whispers and tall tales paint him as a creature of pure menace, a “mean killer” whose reputation is stained with the blood of women and children, his violence often lubricated by whiskey. But the man Eastwood presents to us is laboring under the weight of that history, attempting to bury it, to claim that his transformation is the legacy of his deceased wife, Claudia, whose memory he holds sacred. That repeated assertion, “I ain’t like that anymore,” hangs in the air like a desperate plea, a fragile shield against the darkness within himself.

This internal battleground is not just a matter of words; it's etched onto Munny’s very being. He is no longer the mythic, invincible figure that Eastwood embodied in earlier incarnations. The physical ease, the effortless command, it’s gone. We see him struggle to even mount his horse, a simple act that speaks volumes about the erosion of his physical prowess. His initial attempts at marksmanship are clumsy, betraying a skill dulled by years of dormancy or perhaps by the very weight of his past. And then there’s that brutal beating at the hands of Little Bill, followed by the debilitating fever that leaves him weak and vulnerable. This isn’t the swaggering hero of countless Westerns; this is a man confronting the indignities of age, the fragility of the body, the stark reality of his own mortality. It’s a direct undermining of the genre’s ingrained machismo, a stripping away of the invincibility that often defined its heroes. Munny is a man wrestling not just with his conscience, but with the very limitations of his physical self, a tangible manifestation of the years and the violence that have taken their toll.

The film undertakes a critical examination of traditional notions of machismo predicated on violence. The Schofield Kid’s journey serves to expose the hollowness of violent posturing, while Munny’s deep and abiding connection to the memory of his wife, Claudia, complicates the established image of the self-reliant, rugged individual. Little Bill’s tyrannical authority embodies a destructive form of masculinity rooted in control and sadism.

As this initial part concludes, the film has already begun to dismantle the foundational tenets of the Western hero. Through Munny’s physical decline and the flawed portrayal of violence ,the vulnerabilities and contradictions inherent in these traditionally stoic and powerful archetypes are brought into stark relief. 

In the final part of this Western series I'll take a look at Gene Hackman's character Little Bill, the iconic final shootout and examine the evolution of the western through all the movies in the series.



Older Post


Leave a comment